It is the future plan for ILI9320 / 5 TFT display?

Information and discussion regarding Firewing shields

Re: It is the future plan for ILI9320 / 5 TFT display?

Postby padik » Sat Jul 13, 2013 11:10 am

perfect congratulations advance !!!! :D

Just do not understand why it is not tft library included in the official libraries Firewing?? :?: :!:

Ideal would also be more detailed description of how the library to add additional drivers TFT displays. :?:

How can we integrate the library controller touch display Controller's?? :?:


Finally, congratulations again this library Firewing pushes back a bit further. :mrgreen:


Thank you
padik
 
Posts: 24
Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2013 8:03 pm

Re: It is the future plan for ILI9320 / 5 TFT display?

Postby David John Barker » Sat Jul 13, 2013 2:15 pm

> Just do not understand why it is not tft library included in the official libraries Firewing

It is! Check out the BETA compiler release...

> How can we integrate the library controller touch display Controller's

That would be a good article, I agree.
User avatar
David John Barker
 
Posts: 489
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2012 12:21 pm

Re: It is the future plan for ILI9320 / 5 TFT display?

Postby bitfogav » Sat Jul 13, 2013 2:36 pm

>Ideal would also be more detailed description of how the library to add additional drivers TFT displays.

A Article to show how to add other drivers is a good idea and one I have thought about, just need some more time to get around to making one.

>How can we integrate the library controller touch display Controller's??

I do have a module for the Touch Screen for the Itead TFT but it is still in progress, like before I need some time to finish it.


BTW I do have another type of Shield and TFT display that I would also like to try with the Firewing Library :)
otherTFT.jpg
otherTFT.jpg (19.17 KiB) Viewed 17111 times
User avatar
bitfogav
 
Posts: 75
Joined: Sat Nov 17, 2012 11:46 am
Location: UK

Re: It is the future plan for ILI9320 / 5 TFT display?

Postby David John Barker » Mon Jul 15, 2013 6:31 pm

> I do have a module for the Touch Screen for the Itead TFT but it is still
> in progress, like before I need some time to finish it.

Do keep us informed of progress...

> BTW I do have another type of Shield

That looks like a much bigger screen :D - how big is it? Do you think it will be easy to hook up to Firewing?
User avatar
David John Barker
 
Posts: 489
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2012 12:21 pm

Re: It is the future plan for ILI9320 / 5 TFT display?

Postby bitfogav » Tue Jul 16, 2013 5:10 pm

<That looks like a much bigger screen - how big is it?

It is indeed a bigger screen David, 3.2" TFT, same resolution 320x240 and got it from SainSmart.com

<Do you think it will be easy to hook up to Firewing?

I think the screen would be easy to hook up to firewing with a module Driver SSD1289, not so sure that the IteadStudio Arduino ITDB02 shield adapter for TFT Displays will work without another module/driver. I will update when I have some more information :)
User avatar
bitfogav
 
Posts: 75
Joined: Sat Nov 17, 2012 11:46 am
Location: UK

Re: It is the future plan for ILI9320 / 5 TFT display?

Postby bitfogav » Wed Jul 17, 2013 9:10 pm

Ive just posted on the wiki the Touch Screen module, you can find it here TFT Touch it includes a simple calibration programme and you will need to download the ComicSansMS.zip Font file as well which I used to make the calibration programme. :)
User avatar
bitfogav
 
Posts: 75
Joined: Sat Nov 17, 2012 11:46 am
Location: UK

Re: It is the future plan for ILI9320 / 5 TFT display?

Postby Jerry Messina » Thu Jul 18, 2013 9:15 am

Code: Select all
' disable UART1 on pins D0 and D1...
sub OnStartup() Handles PIC.OnStartup
   RPINR18 = RPINR18 and &HFFE0
   RPOR2 = RPOR2 and &HE0FF   
end sub


If you want to disable the input mapping shouldn't you be ORing RPINR18 with $H1F (input tied to VSS)?
Otherwise, U1RX is being assigned to RP0.
Jerry Messina
 
Posts: 278
Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2013 10:16 am

Re: It is the future plan for ILI9320 / 5 TFT display?

Postby David John Barker » Thu Jul 18, 2013 9:26 am

Hi Jerry

That's my fault. You are correct, to place the register back to it's reset state it needs to be %11111. So an OR is indeed required. RPOR2 reset state requires 0, so the AND is OK. I'll update the sample files to reflect this - thanks for pointing it out...
User avatar
David John Barker
 
Posts: 489
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2012 12:21 pm

Re: It is the future plan for ILI9320 / 5 TFT display?

Postby bitfogav » Thu Jul 18, 2013 4:10 pm

>If you want to disable the input mapping shouldn't you be ORing RPINR18 with $H1F

Thanks Jerry :)
User avatar
bitfogav
 
Posts: 75
Joined: Sat Nov 17, 2012 11:46 am
Location: UK

Previous

Return to Shields

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron

x